BMW Z4 Coupe (E86)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2vsBMW 6 Series (E63) 650i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 6 Series (E63)
650i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque490 Nm361 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.3 L/100 km14.4 mpg US17.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range631 km392 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score53/100
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | BMW6 Series (E63)650i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 343hp256kW | 367hp274kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 490Nm361lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,645kg3,627lb |
| Gross weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 2,095kg4,619lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.7s Calculated | 18.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 16.3L/100 km14.4mpg US17.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 241hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 223hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 298Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 455km282mi Calculated | 631km392mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,246cc198cu in | 4,799cc293cu in |
| Length | 4,113mm162in | 4,820mm190in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,855mm73in |
| Height | 1,271mm50in | 1,373mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,497mm98in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,558mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,516mm60in | 1,596mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 245L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 300L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2: Power / Torque
- BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 6,300 rpm | 3,400 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | BMW6 Series (E63)650i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.7 s | 18.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 343 hp 256 kW |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 367 hp 274 kW |
BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i has 24 hp more than BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 and BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 5.0 s |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 5.5 s |
Although BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i has more power, BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 and BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i and BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 455 km 282 mi |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 631 km 392 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 343 hp 256 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 367 hp 274 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2 | BMW6 Series (E63)650i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 343 hp 256 kW | 367 hp 274 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 455 km 282 mi | 631 km 392 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 245 L 8.7 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 241 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2 | BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 Coupe (E86) M 3.2
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i
- Has 24 hp more
- Has 125 Nm more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 176 km (109 mi) more estimated range
- Has 205 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























