BMW 6 Series (E63)
Car comparison
BMW 6 Series (E63) 645CivsBMW 8 Series (E31) 850Ci 5.4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 8 Series (E31)
850Ci 5.4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful333 hp248 kW
- Lightest1,695 kg3,737 lb
- Best power-to-weight196 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.1 L/100 km14.6 mpg US17.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score53/100
BMW 8 Series (E31) 850Ci 5.4
- Highest torque490 Nm361 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | BMW8 Series (E31)850Ci 5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333hp248kW | 326hp243kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 490Nm361lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,695kg3,737lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Gross weight | 2,065kg4,553lb | 2,300kg5,071lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 90.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.3s Calculated | 22.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 196hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 642km399mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 5,379cc328cu in |
| Length | 4,820mm190in | 4,780mm188in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,855mm73in |
| Height | 1,373mm54in | 1,340mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,684mm106in |
| Front track | 1,558mm61in | 1,554mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,592mm63in | 1,562mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 320L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 264g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci: Power / Torque
- BMW 8 Series (E31) 850Ci 5.4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 6,100 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Ci 5.4 | 5,000 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | BMW8 Series (E31)850Ci 5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.3 s | 22.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 333 hp 248 kW |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Ci 5.4 | 326 hp 243 kW |
BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci has 7 hp more than BMW 8 Series (E31) 850Ci 5.4.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 8 Series (E31) 850Ci 5.4 and BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Ci 5.4 | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Ci 5.4 | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Ci 5.4 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 5.8 s |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Ci 5.4 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci and BMW 8 Series (E31) 850Ci 5.4: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 196 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Ci 5.4 | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 333 hp 248 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Ci 5.4 | 326 hp 243 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Ci 5.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | BMW8 Series (E31)850Ci 5.4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp 248 kW | 326 hp 243 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 642 km 399 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 264 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 196 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 185 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 130 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
BMW 8 Series (E31) 850Ci 5.4
- Has 40 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























