Toyota Supra III (A70)
Car comparison
Toyota Supra III (A70) 3.0 TurbovsBMW 6 Series (E24) · Facelift 1987 M 635CSi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 6 Series (E24) · Facelift 1987
M 635CSi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Toyota Supra III (A70) 3.0 Turbo
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Highest torque344 Nm254 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range636 km395 mi
- Best overall score55/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score55/100
BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Lightest1,515 kg3,340 lb
- Best power-to-weight172 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo | BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 235hp175kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 344Nm254lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,515kg3,340lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,865kg4,112lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 93.4s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.9s Calculated | 29.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17.6L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 636km395mi Calculated | 588km366mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,954cc180cu in | 3,453cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,620mm182in | 4,815mm190in |
| Width | 1,745mm69in | 1,725mm68in |
| Height | 1,310mm52in | 1,355mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | - | 1,430mm56in |
| Rear track | - | 1,464mm58in |
| Trunk volume | - | 335L |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Toyota Supra III (A70) 3.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
- BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo | 5,600 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo | BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.9 s | 29.0 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo | 235 hp 175 kW |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 260 hp 194 kW |
BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi has 25 hp more than Toyota Supra III (A70) 3.0 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Supra III (A70) 3.0 Turbo and BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo | 344 Nm 254 lb-ft |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo | 7.0 s |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi and Toyota Supra III (A70) 3.0 Turbo: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Toyota Supra III (A70) 3.0 Turbo and BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo | 636 km 395 mi |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 588 km 366 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.0 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.9 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Toyota Supra III (A70) 3.0 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ToyotaSupra III (A70)3.0 Turbo | BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 235 hp 175 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 344 Nm 254 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 636 km 395 mi | 588 km 366 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Toyota Supra III (A70) 3.0 Turbo | BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Toyota Supra III (A70) 3.0 Turbo
- Has 14 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi
- Has 25 hp more
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























