BMW 6 Series (E24) · Facelift 1987
Car comparison
BMW 6 Series (E24) · Facelift 1987 M 635CSivsMaserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo CAT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati 228
2.8 i V6 Turbo CAT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo CAT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,240 kg2,734 lb
- Best power-to-weight181 hp/t135 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range695 km432 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best practicality score60/100
BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Lowest city consumption17.6 L/100 km13.4 mpg US16.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,515kg3,340lb | 1,240kg2,734lb |
| Gross weight | 1,865kg4,112lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 93.4s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 69.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.0s Calculated | 24.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.6L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 298Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 588km366mi Calculated | 695km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,453cc211cu in | 2,790cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,815mm190in | 4,460mm176in |
| Width | 1,725mm68in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,355mm53in | 1,330mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,430mm56in | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,464mm58in | 1,550mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 530L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi: Power / Torque
- Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo CAT: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT | 5,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.0 s | 24.8 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 260 hp 194 kW |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT | 225 hp 168 kW |
BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi has 35 hp more than Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo CAT.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo CAT and BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 6.9 s |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT | 5.8 s |
Although BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi has more power, Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo CAT is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo CAT and BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 588 km 366 mi |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT | 695 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.9 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT | 225 hp 168 kW | 5.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo CAT is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1987M 635CSi | Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo CAT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 588 km 366 mi | 695 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi | Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo CAT |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1987 M 635CSi
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo CAT
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 275 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 107 km (66 mi) more estimated range
- Has 195 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























