BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64)
Car comparison
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645CivsTVR Chimaera 4.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTVR Chimaera
4.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful333 hp248 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range543 km337 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score45/100
TVR Chimaera 4.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Lightest1,060 kg2,337 lb
- Best power-to-weight272 hp/t203 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk310 L
- Best performance score69/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | TVRChimaera4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333hp248kW | 288hp215kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 407Nm300lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 1,060kg2,337lb |
| Gross weight | 2,215kg4,883lb | 1,280kg2,822lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 50.9s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.5L/100 km12.7mpg US15.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 272hp/t203kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 384Nm/t257lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 543km337mi Calculated | 422km262mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 4,546cc277cu in |
| Length | 4,820mm190in | 3,965mm156in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,730mm68in |
| Height | 1,373mm54in | 1,223mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,282mm90in |
| Front track | 1,558mm61in | 1,460mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,592mm63in | 1,470mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 310L |
| Max trunk volume | 350L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 57L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci: Power / Torque
- TVR Chimaera 4.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 6,100 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 5,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | TVRChimaera4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.6 s | 15.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 102 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 333 hp 248 kW |
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 288 hp 215 kW |
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci has 45 hp more than TVR Chimaera 4.6.
The biggest power difference is between TVR Chimaera 4.6 and BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci: 45 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 257 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 6.1 s |
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 4.7 s |
Although BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci has more power, TVR Chimaera 4.6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Chimaera 4.6 and BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci and TVR Chimaera 4.6: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 543 km 337 mi |
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 422 km 262 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 333 hp 248 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 288 hp 215 kW | 4.7 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TVRChimaera4.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| TVRChimaera4.6 |
| 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | ||||||
TVR Chimaera 4.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci | TVRChimaera4.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp 248 kW | 288 hp 215 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 543 km 337 mi | 422 km 262 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci | TVR Chimaera 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK | 13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.58 LC100 km | 23.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi | 38.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal | 2,025 L535 US gal445 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,386 LC/year | 3,544 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 645Ci
- Has 45 hp more
- Has 43 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 120 km (75 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
TVR Chimaera 4.6
- Is 755 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 88 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























