BMW 5 Series Touring (G61)
Car comparison
BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520ivsCupra Leon Sportstourer · Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Leon Sportstourer · Facelift 2024
1.5 eTSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
Cupra Leon Sportstourer Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI
- Lightest1,372 kg3,025 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,775kg3,913lb | 1,372kg3,025lb |
| Gross weight | 2,435kg5,368lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 77.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.3s Calculated | 42.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 882km548mi Calculated | 877km545mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 5,060mm199in | 4,657mm183in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,799mm71in |
| Height | 1,515mm60in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,683mm106in |
| Front track | 1,634mm64in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,668mm66in | 1,513mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 155mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,700L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i: Power / Torque
- Cupra Leon Sportstourer Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 4,400-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.3 s | 42.0 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 11.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 190 hp 142 kW |
| CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i has 40 hp more than Cupra Leon Sportstourer Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Leon Sportstourer Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI and BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
| CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 1,372 kg 3,025 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 7.8 s |
| CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 9.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i and Cupra Leon Sportstourer Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Leon Sportstourer Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI and BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 882 km 548 mi |
| CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 877 km 545 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.0 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | CupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | 1,372 kg 3,025 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 882 km 548 mi | 877 km 545 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i | Cupra Leon Sportstourer Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 km (3 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Cupra Leon Sportstourer Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI
- Is 403 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























