Skoda Octavia IV Scout
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSIvsBMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 5 Series Touring (G31)
520d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,678 kg3,699 lb
- Best power-to-weight113 hp/t84 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk640 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score89/100
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,467 km911 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,678kg3,699lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,440kg5,379lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 72.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.1s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 873km542mi Calculated | 1,467km911mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,703mm185in | 4,942mm195in |
| Width | 1,829mm72in | 1,868mm74in |
| Height | 1,487mm59in | 1,498mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,975mm117in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,533mm60in | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 161mm6in | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 640L | 570L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,700L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 118g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.1 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 1,678 kg 3,699 lb |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI and BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d and Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 873 km 542 mi |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 1,467 km 911 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.5 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,678 kg 3,699 lb | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 873 km 542 mi | 1,467 km 911 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 118 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 640 L 22.6 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI | BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI
- Is 62 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 594 km (369 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























