BMW 5 Series Touring (E39) · Facelift 2000
Car comparison
BMW 5 Series Touring (E39) · Facelift 2000 540i V8vsMG ZT-T 4.6 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMG ZT-T
4.6 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 5 Series Touring (E39) Facelift 2000 540i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range569 km354 mi
- Largest trunk410 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score81/100
MG ZT-T 4.6 V8
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption17.9 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.8 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | MGZT-T4.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | 2,310kg5,093lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 73.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.4s Calculated | 21.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km354mi Calculated | 500km311mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 4,601cc281cu in |
| Length | 4,805mm189in | 4,790mm189in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,830mm111in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,516mm60in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,527mm60in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 400L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,525L | 1,220L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 314g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 5 Series Touring (E39) Facelift 2000 540i V8: Power / Torque
- MG ZT-T 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 5,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 5,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | MGZT-T4.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.4 s | 21.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 286 hp 213 kW |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 260 hp 194 kW |
BMW 5 Series Touring (E39) Facelift 2000 540i V8 has 26 hp more than MG ZT-T 4.6 V8.
The biggest power difference is between MG ZT-T 4.6 V8 and BMW 5 Series Touring (E39) Facelift 2000 540i V8: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 6.7 s |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 6.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 5 Series Touring (E39) Facelift 2000 540i V8 and MG ZT-T 4.6 V8: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 569 km 354 mi |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 500 km 311 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 |
| 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 5 Series Touring (E39) Facelift 2000 540i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW5 Series Touring (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | MGZT-T4.6 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 354 mi | 500 km 311 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 314 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 5 Series Touring (E39) Facelift 2000 540i V8 | MG ZT-T 4.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km | 23.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year | 3,465 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 5 Series Touring (E39) Facelift 2000 540i V8
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 69 km (43 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
MG ZT-T 4.6 V8
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























