BMW 5 Series (E60)
Car comparison
BMW 5 Series (E60) 540ivsJaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X350)
4.2 V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 5 Series (E60) 540i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Highest torque411 Nm303 lb-ft
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.0 L/100 km14.7 mpg US17.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW5 Series (E60)540i | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 390Nm288lb-ft | 411Nm303lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 67.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.9s Calculated | 20.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 185hp/t138kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 780km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,000cc244cu in | 4,196cc256cu in |
| Length | 4,841mm191in | 5,090mm200in |
| Width | 1,846mm73in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,448mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,888mm114in | 3,034mm119in |
| Front track | 1,558mm61in | 1,556mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,582mm62in | 1,546mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 520L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 85L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 5 Series (E60) 540i: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E60)540i | 6,300 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW5 Series (E60)540i | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.9 s | 20.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E60)540i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW |
BMW 5 Series (E60) 540i has 6 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V and BMW 5 Series (E60) 540i: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E60)540i | 390 Nm 288 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E60)540i | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E60)540i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E60)540i | 6.2 s |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 5 Series (E60) 540i and Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E60)540i | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E60)540i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E60)540i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW5 Series (E60)540i | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 390 Nm 288 lb-ft | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 780 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 5 Series (E60) 540i
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Has 21 Nm more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























