Volvo S70
Car comparison
Volvo S70 2.3 TurbovsBMW 5 Series (E39) · Facelift 2000 535i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 5 Series (E39) · Facelift 2000
535i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,473 kg3,247 lb
- Best power-to-weight170 hp/t127 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.2 L/100 km14.5 mpg US17.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best practicality score74/100
BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 535i V8
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS702.3 Turbo | BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 345Nm254lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,473kg3,247lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 1,920kg4,233lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 68.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 21.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 593km369mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,319cc142cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 4,775mm188in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,390mm55in | 1,435mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,830mm111in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,512mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | 1,526mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 460L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo: Power / Torque
- BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 535i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 6,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | 5,800 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS702.3 Turbo | BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 21.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 250 hp 186 kW |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo has 5 hp more than BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 535i V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 535i V8 and Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | 345 Nm 254 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 1,473 kg 3,247 lb |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 6.7 s |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo and BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 535i V8: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS702.3 Turbo | BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 345 Nm 254 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,473 kg 3,247 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 593 km 369 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 535i V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 137 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 535i V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























