BMW 5 Series (E34)
Car comparison
BMW 5 Series (E34) 540i V8vsNissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Cedric (Y33)
3.0T V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 5 Series (E34) 540i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight178 hp/t133 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range702 km436 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score76/100
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 | NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 270hp201kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 368Nm271lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,605kg3,538lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,115kg4,663lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 66.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.1s Calculated | 25.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 178hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 702km436mi Calculated | 620km385mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 2,987cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | - |
| Width | 1,751mm69in | - |
| Height | 1,412mm56in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,761mm109in | - |
| Front track | 1,470mm58in | - |
| Rear track | 1,495mm59in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 5 Series (E34) 540i V8: Power / Torque
- Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 | 5,800 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 | NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.1 s | 25.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 105 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 | 286 hp 213 kW |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 270 hp 201 kW |
BMW 5 Series (E34) 540i V8 has 16 hp more than Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 and BMW 5 Series (E34) 540i V8: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 | 6.8 s |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 5 Series (E34) 540i V8 and Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 5 Series (E34) 540i V8 and Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 | 178 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 | 702 km 436 mi |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 620 km 385 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 270 hp 201 kW | 7.0 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 5 Series (E34) 540i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 | 178 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW5 Series (E34)540i V8 | NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 270 hp 201 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 702 km 436 mi | 620 km 385 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 178 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 5 Series (E34) 540i V8 | Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 5 Series (E34) 540i V8
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 32 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 82 km (51 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
- Is 35 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























