Porsche Cayman (981C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7vsBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32)
430d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions132 g/km
- Best estimated range1,140 km708 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
- Fastest top speed266 km/h165 mph
- Most powerful275 hp205 kW
- Lightest1,330 kg2,932 lb
- Best power-to-weight207 hp/t154 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 275hp205kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 290Nm214lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,330kg2,932lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.8s99% target: 263 km/h / 164 mph Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.3s Calculated | 19.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 207hp/t154kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 364Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 762km473mi Calculated | 1,140km708mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,706cc165cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,380mm172in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,294mm51in | 1,377mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 445L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 57L |
| CO2 emissions | 195g/km | 132g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: Power / Torque
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7,400 rpm | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d | 4,000 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.3 s | 19.9 s |
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 275 hp 205 kW |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d | 258 hp 192 kW |
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 has 17 hp more than BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 5.7 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d | 5.5 s |
Although Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 has more power, BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 762 km 473 mi |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d | 1,140 km 708 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.7 s | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d | 258 hp 192 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 275 hp 205 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 762 km 473 mi | 1,140 km 708 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 195 g/km | 132 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
- Has 17 hp more
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d
- Has 270 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 378 km (235 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
- Emits 63 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























