Scion FR-S
Car comparison
Scion FR-S 2.0vsBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32)
420i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions162 g/km
- Best estimated range857 km533 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Scion FR-S 2.0
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,251 kg2,758 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ScionFR-S2.0 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 205Nm151lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,251kg2,758lb | 1,520kg3,351lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 92.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.4s Calculated | 33.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 641km398mi Calculated | 857km533mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,234mm167in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,775mm70in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,570mm101in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,519mm60in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,539mm61in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 195L | 445L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 181g/km | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Scion FR-S 2.0: Power / Torque
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 7,000 rpm | 6,400-6,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 5,000-6,250 rpm | 1,250-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ScionFR-S2.0 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.4 s | 33.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 184 hp 137 kW |
Scion FR-S 2.0 has 16 hp more than BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i and Scion FR-S 2.0: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 1,251 kg 2,758 lb |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 7.6 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 7.4 s |
Although Scion FR-S 2.0 has more power, BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i and Scion FR-S 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i and Scion FR-S 2.0: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 641 km 398 mi |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 857 km 533 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.4 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Scion FR-S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ScionFR-S2.0 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,251 kg 2,758 lb | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 641 km 398 mi | 857 km 533 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 181 g/km | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 195 L 6.9 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Scion FR-S 2.0 | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Scion FR-S 2.0
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 269 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i
- Has 65 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 216 km (134 mi) more estimated range
- Has 250 L more trunk volume
- Emits 19 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























