BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32)
Car comparison
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420ivsVolkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions115 g/km
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score95/100
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,395kg3,075lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.3s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 90.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.4s Calculated | 34.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,034km643mi Calculated | 1,250km777mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,256mm168in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,377mm54in | 1,406mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 312L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,006L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | 115g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 5,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.4 s | 34.3 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 184 hp 137 kW |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 7.5 s |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 7.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI and BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 1,034 km 643 mi |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,250 km 777 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,034 km 643 mi | 1,250 km 777 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | 115 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 312 L 11.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i | Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 133 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 216 km (134 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 19 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























