Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 200vsBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32)
420i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions136 g/km
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score91/100
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i
- Best estimated range968 km601 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 1,985kg4,376lb | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.5s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 98.0s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.8s Calculated | 36.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 847km527mi Calculated | 968km601mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,544mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,590mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 89mm4in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 400L | 445L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 136g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 200: Power / Torque
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 5,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.8 s | 36.0 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 7.7 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 200 and BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 847 km 527 mi |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 968 km 601 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.8 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 847 km 527 mi | 968 km 601 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 136 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 200 | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 200
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i
- Has 120 km (75 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























