BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32)
Car comparison
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420ivsBMW X4 (F26) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X4 (F26)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X4 (F26) 20d
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions138 g/km
- Best estimated range1,288 km801 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score75/100
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | BMWX4 (F26)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Gross weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | 2,335kg5,148lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.0s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 99.9s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.0s Calculated | 54.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 968km601mi Calculated | 1,288km801mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,671mm184in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,392mm55in | 1,624mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,544mm61in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,632mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,400L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 138g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i: Power / Torque
- BMW X4 (F26) 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 5,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| BMWX4 (F26)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | BMWX4 (F26)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.0 s | 54.7 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 141 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 184 hp 137 kW |
| BMWX4 (F26)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X4 (F26) 20d has 6 hp more than BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i and BMW X4 (F26) 20d: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| BMWX4 (F26)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| BMWX4 (F26)20d | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| BMWX4 (F26)20d | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 7.8 s |
| BMWX4 (F26)20d | 8.0 s |
Although BMW X4 (F26) 20d has more power, BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i and BMW X4 (F26) 20d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 (F26)20d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X4 (F26) 20d and BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| BMWX4 (F26)20d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 968 km 601 mi |
| BMWX4 (F26)20d | 1,288 km 801 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.8 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| BMWX4 (F26)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX4 (F26)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX4 (F26)20d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| BMWX4 (F26)20d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 (F26)20d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i | BMWX4 (F26)20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 968 km 601 mi | 1,288 km 801 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 138 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i | BMW X4 (F26) 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X4 (F26) 20d
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 321 km (199 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























