BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32)
Car comparison
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420ivsBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) · Facelift 2017 420i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) · Facelift 2017
420i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i 1997 cc
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score53/100
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420i 1998 cc
- Highest torque290 Nm214 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions141 g/km
- Best estimated range984 km611 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 290Nm214lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,475kg3,252lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 91.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.3s Calculated | 31.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 952km592mi Calculated | 984km611mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,640mm183in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,377mm54in | 1,377mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,593mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 445L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 147g/km | 141g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i 1997 cc: Power / Torque
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420i 1998 cc: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc | 5,000-6,250 rpm | 1,250-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc | 5,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.3 s | 31.5 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc | 184 hp 137 kW |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc | 7.3 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc | 7.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc | 952 km 592 mi |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc | 984 km 611 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.3 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.3 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i 1997 cc is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420i1997 cc | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420i1998 cc | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 952 km 592 mi | 984 km 611 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 147 g/km | 141 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i 1997 cc | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420i 1998 cc |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420i 1997 cc
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420i 1998 cc
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 31 km (19 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























