BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) · Facelift 2017 420dvsBMW X4 (G02) 25d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X4 (G02)
25d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X4 (G02) 25d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score76/100
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420d
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions114 g/km
- Best estimated range1,326 km824 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | BMWX4 (G02)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,420kg5,335lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.2s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 89.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.4s Calculated | 32.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,326km824mi Calculated | 1,053km654mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,640mm183in | 4,752mm187in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,918mm76in |
| Height | 1,377mm54in | 1,621mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,864mm113in |
| Front track | 1,547mm61in | 1,620mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,593mm63in | 1,666mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,430L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 114g/km | 149g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420d: Power / Torque
- BMW X4 (G02) 25d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX4 (G02)25d | 4,400 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | BMWX4 (G02)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.4 s | 32.8 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| BMWX4 (G02)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
BMW X4 (G02) 25d has 41 hp more than BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420d and BMW X4 (G02) 25d: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX4 (G02)25d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| BMWX4 (G02)25d | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| BMWX4 (G02)25d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 7.1 s |
| BMWX4 (G02)25d | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X4 (G02) 25d and BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 (G02)25d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420d and BMW X4 (G02) 25d: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX4 (G02)25d | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 1,326 km 824 mi |
| BMWX4 (G02)25d | 1,053 km 654 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.1 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| BMWX4 (G02)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX4 (G02)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX4 (G02)25d |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X4 (G02) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| BMWX4 (G02)25d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 (G02)25d | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | BMWX4 (G02)25d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,326 km 824 mi | 1,053 km 654 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 114 g/km | 149 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420d | BMW X4 (G02) 25d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.52 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,129 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420d
- Is 255 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 273 km (170 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 35 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW X4 (G02) 25d
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























