Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) · Facelift 2013 E 200vsBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32)
420d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,213 km754 mi
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 200
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 2,085kg4,597lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 90.4s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.2s Calculated | 32.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 1,213km754mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,703mm185in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,786mm70in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,397mm55in | 1,377mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,594mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 57L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 200: Power / Torque
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.2 s | 32.9 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 | 7.8 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d and Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 200: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d and Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 200: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 1,213 km 754 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.8 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.3 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 1,213 km 754 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 200 | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 200
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 113 km (70 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























