Subaru BRZ I
Car comparison
Subaru BRZ I 2.0vsBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32)
420d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,163 km723 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Subaru BRZ I 2.0
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,202 kg2,650 lb
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SubaruBRZ I2.0 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 205Nm151lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,202kg2,650lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 88.6s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.1s Calculated | 33.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 725km450mi Calculated | 1,163km723mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,240mm167in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,775mm70in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,570mm101in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 243L | 445L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 57L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 128g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Subaru BRZ I 2.0: Power / Torque
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 7,000 rpm | 6,400-6,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SubaruBRZ I2.0 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.1 s | 33.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 184 hp 137 kW |
Subaru BRZ I 2.0 has 16 hp more than BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d and Subaru BRZ I 2.0: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 1,202 kg 2,650 lb |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 7.6 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 7.3 s |
Although Subaru BRZ I 2.0 has more power, BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d and Subaru BRZ I 2.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d and Subaru BRZ I 2.0: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 725 km 450 mi |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 1,163 km 723 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.3 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SubaruBRZ I2.0 | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,202 kg 2,650 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 725 km 450 mi | 1,163 km 723 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 128 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 243 L 8.6 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Subaru BRZ I 2.0 | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Subaru BRZ I 2.0
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 338 kg lighter
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d
- Has 175 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 439 km (273 mi) more estimated range
- Has 202 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























