BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32)
Car comparison
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420dvsBMW X5 (F15) 25d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (F15)
25d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions128 g/km
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
BMW X5 (F15) 25d
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,316 km818 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | BMWX5 (F15)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | 2,705kg5,964lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.6s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 115.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.9s Calculated | 49.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,163km723mi Calculated | 1,316km818mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,886mm192in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,392mm55in | 1,762mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | 209mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,870L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 128g/km | 151g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (F15) 25d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | BMWX5 (F15)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.9 s | 49.3 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 184 hp 137 kW |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 218 hp 163 kW |
BMW X5 (F15) 25d has 34 hp more than BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d and BMW X5 (F15) 25d: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 7.3 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 8.2 s |
Although BMW X5 (F15) 25d has more power, BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d and BMW X5 (F15) 25d: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d and BMW X5 (F15) 25d: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 1,163 km 723 mi |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 1,316 km 818 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.3 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 218 hp 163 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)25d |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | BMWX5 (F15)25d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,163 km 723 mi | 1,316 km 818 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 128 g/km | 151 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d | BMW X5 (F15) 25d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d
- Is 455 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 23 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (F15) 25d
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 153 km (95 mi) more estimated range
- Has 205 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























