BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32)
Car comparison
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420dvsVolkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,213 km754 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,271 kg2,802 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,271kg2,802lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 85.4s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.1s Calculated | 34.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,213km754mi Calculated | 902km560mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,256mm168in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,392mm55in | 1,406mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | 129mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 312L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,006L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 4,200-6,200 rpm | 1,250-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.1 s | 34.4 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI and BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 1,271 kg 2,802 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d and Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d and Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 1,213 km 754 mi |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 902 km 560 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.4 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)420d | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,271 kg 2,802 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,213 km 754 mi | 902 km 560 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 312 L 11.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d | Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 420d
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 311 km (193 mi) more estimated range
- Has 133 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TSI
- Is 289 kg lighter
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























