BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33)
Car comparison
BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 435dvsBMW X5 (F15) 40d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (F15)
40d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 435d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful313 hp233 kW
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Lightest1,850 kg4,079 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions155 g/km
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score91/100
BMW X5 (F15) 40d
- Best estimated range1,349 km838 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d | BMWX5 (F15)40d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313hp233kW | 313hp233kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 630Nm465lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,820kg6,217lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 87.8s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 966km600mi Calculated | 1,349km838mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,886mm192in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,399mm55in | 1,762mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,544mm61in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | 209mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 370L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,870L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | 166g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 435d: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (F15) 40d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX5 (F15)40d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d | BMWX5 (F15)40d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d | 313 hp 233 kW |
| BMWX5 (F15)40d | 313 hp 233 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (F15)40d | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| BMWX5 (F15)40d | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)40d | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d | 5.2 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)40d | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 435d and BMW X5 (F15) 40d: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)40d | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (F15)40d | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d | 966 km 600 mi |
| BMWX5 (F15)40d | 1,349 km 838 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)40d | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.9 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)40d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)40d |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 435d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)40d | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)40d | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)435d | BMWX5 (F15)40d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp 233 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 966 km 600 mi | 1,349 km 838 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | 166 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 435d | BMW X5 (F15) 40d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 435d
- Is 260 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 11 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (F15) 40d
- Has 383 km (238 mi) more estimated range
- Has 280 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























