BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33)
Car comparison
BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 425dvsBMW X5 (F15) 25d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (F15)
25d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 425d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score94/100
BMW X5 (F15) 25d
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,574 km978 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d | BMWX5 (F15)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Gross weight | 2,240kg4,938lb | 2,710kg5,975lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.9s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 107.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.2s Calculated | 45.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t86kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,188km738mi Calculated | 1,574km978mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,886mm192in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,384mm54in | 1,762mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | 209mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 370L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,870L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 141g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 425d: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (F15) 25d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d | BMWX5 (F15)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.2 s | 45.9 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d | 224 hp 167 kW |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
BMW X5 (F15) 25d has 7 hp more than BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 425d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 425d and BMW X5 (F15) 25d: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d | 6.7 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 7.7 s |
Although BMW X5 (F15) 25d has more power, BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 425d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 425d and BMW X5 (F15) 25d: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 425d and BMW X5 (F15) 25d: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d | 1,188 km 738 mi |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 1,574 km 978 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.7 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)25d |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 425d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)25d | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)425d | BMWX5 (F15)25d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,188 km 738 mi | 1,574 km 978 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 141 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 425d | BMW X5 (F15) 25d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 425d
- Is 250 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (F15) 25d
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 387 km (240 mi) more estimated range
- Has 280 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























