BMW 3 Series Touring (G21)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318ivsSkoda Octavia IV Scout 1.5 TSI ACT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia IV Scout
1.5 TSI ACT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful156 hp116 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight99 hp/t74 kW/t10.1 kg/hp
- Best estimated range952 km591 mi
- Best performance score44/100
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 1.5 TSI ACT
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk640 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,589kg3,503lb |
| Gross weight | 2,135kg4,707lb | 1,951kg4,301lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 81.0s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.8s Calculated | 41.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 159Nm/t107lb-ft/ton Calculated | 157Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 952km591mi Calculated | 918km571mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,709mm185in | 4,703mm185in |
| Width | 1,827mm72in | 1,829mm72in |
| Height | 1,440mm57in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,851mm112in | 2,688mm106in |
| Front track | 1,573mm62in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,588mm63in | 1,531mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 640L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 112g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia IV Scout 1.5 TSI ACT: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 1,300-4,300 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.8 s | 41.1 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 156 hp 116 kW |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT | 150 hp 112 kW |
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia IV Scout 1.5 TSI ACT.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 1.5 TSI ACT and BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 8.7 s |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT | 8.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 1.5 TSI ACT and BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 952 km 591 mi |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT | 918 km 571 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.7 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | SkodaOctavia IV Scout1.5 TSI ACT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 952 km 591 mi | 918 km 571 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 112 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 640 L 22.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i | Skoda Octavia IV Scout 1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 19 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 33 km (21 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 1.5 TSI ACT
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























