BMW 3 Series Touring (E91)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 335dvsVolvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC70 II
3.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 335d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions205 g/km
- Best estimated range818 km508 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score86/100
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d | VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 285hp213kW |
| Torque | 580Nm428lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,769kg3,900lb |
| Gross weight | 2,185kg4,817lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 69.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.1s Calculated | 34.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 337Nm/t226lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 818km508mi Calculated | 609km378mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,953cc180cu in |
| Length | 4,520mm178in | 4,838mm190in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,861mm73in |
| Height | 1,418mm56in | 1,604mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,815mm111in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 210mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,375L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 205g/km | 269g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 335d: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 5,950 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 6,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d | VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.1 s | 34.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 105 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d | 286 hp 213 kW |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 285 hp 213 kW |
BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 335d has 1 hp more than Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 and BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 335d: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d | 6.3 s |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 335d and Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 335d and Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: 3.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d | 818 km 508 mi |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 609 km 378 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 285 hp 213 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 335d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Touring (E91)335d | VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 285 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 818 km 508 mi | 609 km 378 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 205 g/km | 269 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 335d | Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 335d
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 49 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 209 km (130 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 64 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
- Has 125 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























