BMW 3 Series Touring (E91)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 330xivsVolvo V70 II · Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V70 II · Facelift 2004
2.4i 20V T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score84/100
BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 330xi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Lowest city consumption14.0 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score57/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 73.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.2s Calculated | 25.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 700km435mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 2,401cc147cu in |
| Length | 4,520mm178in | 4,710mm185in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,418mm56in | 1,514mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,755mm108in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,560mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 485L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,385L | 1,641L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 239g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 330xi: Power / Torque
- Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 6,600 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5 | 5,500 rpm | 2,100 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.2 s | 25.2 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 258 hp 192 kW |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5 | 260 hp 194 kW |
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5 has 2 hp more than BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 330xi.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 330xi and Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 6.6 s |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5 | 7.2 s |
Although Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5 has more power, BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 330xi is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 330xi and Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.6 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.2 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 700 km 435 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 239 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 330xi
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























