BMW 3 Series Touring (E91)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 330xivsOpel Vectra C Caravan · Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonOpel Vectra C Caravan · Facelift 2005
2.8i V6 24V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Opel Vectra C Caravan Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score85/100
BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 330xi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Lowest city consumption14.0 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best performance score57/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | OpelVectra C CaravanFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,545kg3,406lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 73.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.2s Calculated | 24.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK | 15.5L/100 km15.2mpg US18.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 577km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 2,792cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,520mm178in | 4,839mm191in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,418mm56in | 1,500mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,830mm111in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,536mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,525mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 530L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,385L | 1,850L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 330xi: Power / Torque
- Opel Vectra C Caravan Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 6,600 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| OpelVectra C CaravanFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 5,500 rpm | - | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | OpelVectra C CaravanFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.2 s | 24.1 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 258 hp 192 kW |
| OpelVectra C CaravanFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 250 hp 186 kW |
BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 330xi has 8 hp more than Opel Vectra C Caravan Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Opel Vectra C Caravan Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo and BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 330xi: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| OpelVectra C CaravanFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
| OpelVectra C CaravanFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| OpelVectra C CaravanFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 6.6 s |
| OpelVectra C CaravanFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 330xi and Opel Vectra C Caravan Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| OpelVectra C CaravanFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.6 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| OpelVectra C CaravanFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.1 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| OpelVectra C CaravanFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi | OpelVectra C CaravanFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 577 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Opel Vectra C Caravan Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Touring (E91) 330xi
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Opel Vectra C Caravan Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























