BMW 3 Series Touring (E46) · Facelift 2001
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Touring (E46) · Facelift 2001 330xivsVolvo V50 2.5 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V50
2.5 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Touring (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range624 km388 mi
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | VolvoV502.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.7s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.7s Calculated | 28.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 624km388mi Calculated | 569km353mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,478mm176in | 4,514mm178in |
| Width | 1,739mm68in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,429mm56in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,471mm58in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 435L | 417L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,345L | 1,307L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 243g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Touring (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi: Power / Torque
- Volvo V50 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | VolvoV502.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.7 s | 28.3 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 231 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
BMW 3 Series Touring (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi has 11 hp more than Volvo V50 2.5 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V50 2.5 T5 and BMW 3 Series Touring (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 6.8 s |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Touring (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi and Volvo V50 2.5 T5: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 624 km 388 mi |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 569 km 353 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.8 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Touring (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | VolvoV502.5 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 624 km 388 mi | 569 km 353 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 243 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Touring (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi | Volvo V50 2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Touring (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi
- Has 11 hp more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 55 km (34 mi) more estimated range
- Has 18 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























