Volvo C70 Coupe
Car comparison
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V TvsBMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) · Facelift 2003 330Cd
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) · Facelift 2003
330Cd
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range818 km508 mi
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk427 L
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,555kg3,428lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 93.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.4s Calculated | 32.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 654km407mi Calculated | 818km508mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,435cc149cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 4,488mm177in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,757mm69in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,369mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,725mm107in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,471mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,483mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 427L | 410L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T: Power / Torque
- BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.4 s | 32.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 193 hp 144 kW |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 204 hp 152 kW |
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd has 11 hp more than Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T and BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 7.8 s |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 654 km 407 mi |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 818 km 508 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 654 km 407 mi | 818 km 508 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T | BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 17 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Cd
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 164 km (102 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























