BMW 3 Series Convertible (E93)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Convertible (E93) 330dvsVolvo C70 Convertible 2.3 i 20V T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C70 Convertible
2.3 i 20V T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Convertible (E93) 330d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque540 Nm398 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score90/100
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 i 20V T5
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk262 L
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Convertible (E93)330d | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 540Nm398lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 89.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 104.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.4s Calculated | 29.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,033km642mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,319cc142cu in |
| Length | 4,580mm180in | 4,716mm186in |
| Width | 1,782mm70in | 1,817mm72in |
| Height | 1,384mm54in | 1,429mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 210L | 262L |
| Max trunk volume | 350L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Convertible (E93) 330d: Power / Torque
- Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 i 20V T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E93)330d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 i 20V T5 | 5,400 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Convertible (E93)330d | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.4 s | 29.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E93)330d | 245 hp 183 kW |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 i 20V T5 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E93)330d | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 i 20V T5 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E93)330d | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 i 20V T5 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E93)330d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 i 20V T5 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E93)330d | 6.4 s |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 i 20V T5 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Convertible (E93) 330d and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 i 20V T5: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E93)330d | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 i 20V T5 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E93)330d | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 i 20V T5 | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Convertible (E93)330d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 i 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Convertible (E93)330d | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 i 20V T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,033 km 642 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 210 L 7.4 cu ft | 262 L 9.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Convertible (E93) 330d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Convertible (E93) 330d
- Has 210 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 i 20V T5
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 52 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























