BMW 3 Series Compact (E46)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325tivsBMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 3 Series Sedan (G20)
320d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range909 km565 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score74/100
BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 245Nm181lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 1,905kg4,200lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 61.8s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.4s Calculated | 25.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | 909km565mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,494cc152cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,262mm168in | 4,709mm185in |
| Width | 1,751mm69in | 1,827mm72in |
| Height | 1,408mm55in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,851mm112in |
| Front track | 1,474mm58in | 1,573mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,567mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 480L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,100L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 40L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti: Power / Torque
- BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.4 s | 25.3 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 192 hp 143 kW |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti has 2 hp more than BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d and BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 7.1 s |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 6.9 s |
Although BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti has more power, BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d and BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d and BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti: 4.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 708 km 440 mi |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 909 km 565 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.9 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | 909 km 565 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti | BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 215 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d
- Has 155 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 201 km (125 mi) more estimated range
- Has 170 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























