BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) 330xivsBMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 3 Series Compact (E46)
325ti
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) 330xi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed247 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score73/100
BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range708 km440 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi | BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 245Nm181lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,405kg3,097lb |
| Gross weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | 1,905kg4,200lb |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.8s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated | 81.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.7s Calculated | 29.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 636km395mi Calculated | 708km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,494cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,471mm176in | 4,262mm168in |
| Width | 1,739mm68in | 1,751mm69in |
| Height | 1,434mm56in | 1,408mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,725mm107in |
| Front track | 1,471mm58in | 1,474mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,483mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 310L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,100L |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) 330xi: Power / Torque
- BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi | BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.7 s | 29.4 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 103 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi | 231 hp 172 kW |
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 192 hp 143 kW |
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) 330xi has 39 hp more than BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti and BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) 330xi: 39 hp (29 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi | 6.6 s |
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) 330xi and BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti and BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) 330xi: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi | 636 km 395 mi |
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 708 km 440 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.6 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) 330xi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)330xi | BMW3 Series Compact (E46)325ti | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 636 km 395 mi | 708 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) 330xi | BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) 330xi
- Has 39 hp more
- Has 55 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 130 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW 3 Series Compact (E46) 325ti
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 72 km (44 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























