Car comparison

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220ivsFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)

220i

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    223 km/h
    139 mph
  • Lightest
    1,455 kg
    3,208 lb
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    149 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    645 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo

  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    141 hp/t
    105 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,111 km
    690 mi
  • Best performance score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220iFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Power
192hp143kW
240hp179kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,455kg3,208lb
1,704kg3,757lb
Gross weight
2,100kg4,630lb
2,620kg5,776lb
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
87.4s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
97.2s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
37.8s
Calculated
48.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
953km592mi
Calculated
1,111km690mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,556mm179in
4,848mm191in
Width
1,800mm71in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,608mm63in
1,747mm69in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,849mm112in
Front track
1,557mm61in
1,606mm63in
Rear track
1,558mm61in
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
124mm5in
Trunk volume
645L
300L
Max trunk volume
1,905L
2,339L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
70L
CO2 emissions
149g/km
163g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220iFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurboPowerTorque
  • BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i: Power / Torque
  • Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i5,000 rpm1,250 rpm5,250 rpm
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo4,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220iFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.8 s
48.9 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
192 hp
143 kW
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
240 hp
179 kW

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo has 48 hp more than BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo: 48 hp (36 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
1,704 kg
3,757 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
223 km/h
139 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
216 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i7.7 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo8.7 s

Although Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo has more power, BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
953 km
592 mi
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
1,111 km
690 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
192 hp
143 kW
7.7 s
223 km/h
139 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
240 hp
179 kW
8.7 s
216 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Length
4,556 mm
179.4 in
Height
1,608 mm
63.3 in
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.7 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220iFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Power
192 hp
143 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
8.7 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Length
4,556 mm
179.4 in
Height
1,608 mm
63.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Range score
953 km
592 mi
1,111 km
690 mi
CO2 score
149 g/km
163 g/km
Trunk score
645 L
22.8 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220iFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i

  • Is 249 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 345 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo

  • Has 48 hp more
  • Has 220 Nm more
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 158 km (98 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

220i
220d
VS
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220ivsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurbovsFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
220i
223i
VS
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220ivsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurbovsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
220i
220i
VS
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220ivsBMW2 Series Convertible (F23)220i
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurbovsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
220i
220i
VS
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220ivsBMW2 Series Coupe (F22)220i
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurbovsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
220i
220d
VS
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220ivsBMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F44)220d
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurbovsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
220i
220i
VS
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220ivsBMW2 Series Coupe (G42)220i
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 TSI
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurbovsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i vs Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster