BMW 2 Series Coupe (G42)
Car comparison
BMW 2 Series Coupe (G42) 230ivsLynk & Co 05 2.0TD T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 05
2.0TD T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 2 Series Coupe (G42) 230i
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range722 km449 mi
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score87/100
Lynk & Co 05 2.0TD T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score64/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i | Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 254hp189kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,788kg3,942lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 2,163kg4,769lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 94.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 95.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.0s Calculated | 29.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 722km449mi Calculated | 692km430mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,537mm179in | 4,592mm181in |
| Width | 1,838mm72in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,390mm55in | 1,628mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,741mm108in | 2,734mm108in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,598mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | 1,623mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 336L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,070L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 54L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 2 Series Coupe (G42) 230i: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 05 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i | Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.0 s | 29.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i | 245 hp 183 kW |
| Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
Lynk & Co 05 2.0TD T5 has 9 hp more than BMW 2 Series Coupe (G42) 230i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Coupe (G42) 230i and Lynk & Co 05 2.0TD T5: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 | 1,788 kg 3,942 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i | 6.9 s |
| Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 05 2.0TD T5 and BMW 2 Series Coupe (G42) 230i: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 2 Series Coupe (G42) 230i and Lynk & Co 05 2.0TD T5: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i | 722 km 449 mi |
| Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 | 692 km 430 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 2 Series Coupe (G42) 230i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW2 Series Coupe (G42)230i | Lynk & Co052.0TD T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 254 hp 189 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,788 kg 3,942 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 722 km 449 mi | 692 km 430 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 336 L 11.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 2 Series Coupe (G42) 230i | Lynk & Co 05 2.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 2 Series Coupe (G42) 230i
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 188 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 km (19 mi) more estimated range
- Has 54 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Lynk & Co 05 2.0TD T5
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























