BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45)
Car comparison
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 225ivsBMW X4 (F26) 28i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X4 (F26)
28i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 225i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions152 g/km
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score85/100
BMW X4 (F26) 28i
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Best estimated range918 km570 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i | BMWX4 (F26)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.3s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 90.3s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.5s Calculated | 31.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 785km488mi Calculated | 918km570mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,342mm171in | 4,671mm184in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,555mm61in | 1,624mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,632mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 468L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | 1,400L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 152g/km | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 225i: Power / Torque
- BMW X4 (F26) 28i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i | 5,000 rpm | 1,250 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| BMWX4 (F26)28i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i | BMWX4 (F26)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.5 s | 31.2 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 100 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i | 231 hp 172 kW |
| BMWX4 (F26)28i | 245 hp 183 kW |
BMW X4 (F26) 28i has 14 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 225i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 225i and BMW X4 (F26) 28i: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BMWX4 (F26)28i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| BMWX4 (F26)28i | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| BMWX4 (F26)28i | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i | 6.3 s |
| BMWX4 (F26)28i | 6.4 s |
Although BMW X4 (F26) 28i has more power, BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 225i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 225i and BMW X4 (F26) 28i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 (F26)28i | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 225i and BMW X4 (F26) 28i: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| BMWX4 (F26)28i | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i | 785 km 488 mi |
| BMWX4 (F26)28i | 918 km 570 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.3 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| BMWX4 (F26)28i | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.4 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX4 (F26)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX4 (F26)28i |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 225i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| BMWX4 (F26)28i | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 (F26)28i | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i | BMWX4 (F26)28i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 785 km 488 mi | 918 km 570 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 152 g/km | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 468 L 16.5 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 225i | BMW X4 (F26) 28i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 225i
- Is 260 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW X4 (F26) 28i
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 133 km (83 mi) more estimated range
- Has 32 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























