BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)
Car comparison
BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 218vsBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45)
218d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lightest1,410 kg3,109 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,186 km737 mi
- Largest trunk468 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score85/100
BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 218
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful156 hp116 kW
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score45/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,410kg3,109lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 1,955kg4,310lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 100.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 88.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.5s Calculated | 54.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 162Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 778km483mi Calculated | 1,186km737mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,499cc91cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,546mm179in | 4,342mm171in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,555mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,561mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 468L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,510L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 49L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 114g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 218: Power / Torque
- BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 | 4,900-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.5 s | 54.6 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 | 156 hp 116 kW |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 150 hp 112 kW |
BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 218 has 6 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d and BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 218: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 | 8.6 s |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 218 and BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d and BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 218: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 | 778 km 483 mi |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 1,186 km 737 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.6 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 218 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)218 | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 778 km 483 mi | 1,186 km 737 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 114 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 468 L 16.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 218 | BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 218
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 218d
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 408 km (254 mi) more estimated range
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























