Nissan 370Z
Car comparison
Nissan 370Z 3.7vsBMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 1M Coupe (E82)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t170 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk370 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Nissan 370Z 3.7
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Best estimated range679 km422 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Nissan370Z3.7 | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 328hp245kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 363Nm268lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,496kg3,298lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 68.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 63.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.0s Calculated | 17.3s |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 227hp/t170kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 334Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 679km422mi Calculated | 552km343mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,696cc226cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,250mm167in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 1,803mm71in |
| Height | 1,310mm52in | 1,420mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,550mm61in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,595mm63in | 1,541mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 235L | 370L |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 53L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan 370Z 3.7: Power / Torque
- BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 7,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 5,900 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Nissan370Z3.7 | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.0 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 328 hp 245 kW |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 340 hp 254 kW |
BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 has 12 hp more than Nissan 370Z 3.7.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 370Z 3.7 and BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 1,496 kg 3,298 lb |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z3.7 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 5.3 s |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 and Nissan 370Z 3.7: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 and Nissan 370Z 3.7: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 227 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 679 km 422 mi |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 552 km 343 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 328 hp 245 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan370Z3.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan370Z3.7 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 227 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Nissan370Z3.7 | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 328 hp 245 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,496 kg 3,298 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 679 km 422 mi | 552 km 343 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 227 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan 370Z 3.7 | BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.55 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,783 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan 370Z 3.7
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 127 km (79 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 137 Nm more
- Is 1 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 135 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























