BMW M2 coupe (F87)
Car comparison
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0vsBMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 1M Coupe (E82)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful370 hp276 kW
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight247 hp/t185 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range612 km380 mi
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score51/100
BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 370hp276kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 63.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.8s Calculated | 17.3s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 247hp/t185kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated | 227hp/t170kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 334Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 612km380mi Calculated | 552km343mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,468mm176in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,803mm71in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,420mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,693mm106in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,601mm63in | 1,541mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 123mm5in | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 370L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 53L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,400-5,560 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 5,900 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.8 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 340 hp 254 kW |
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 has 30 hp more than BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 and BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 4.5 s |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 and BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 and BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 247 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 227 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 612 km 380 mi |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 552 km 343 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 247 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | 227 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 370 hp 276 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 612 km 380 mi | 552 km 343 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 247 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 227 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 | BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0
- Has 30 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 60 km (37 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0
- Has 35 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























