BMW 1M Coupe (E82)
Car comparison
BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 · Stage 3vsBMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 · Stage 2vsBMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 · Stage 1vsBMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 1M Coupe (E82)
3.0 (Stage 2)
BMW 1M Coupe (E82)
3.0 (Stage 1)
BMW 1M Coupe (E82)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 (Stage 3) 510 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed313 km/h194 mph
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Highest torque775 Nm572 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight341 hp/t254 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range552 km343 mi
- Largest trunk370 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW+170 hp | 442hp330kW+102 hp | 401hp299kW+61 hp | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 775Nm572lb-ft+275 Nm | 675Nm498lb-ft+175 Nm | 610Nm450lb-ft+110 Nm | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 1,900kg4,189lb | 1,900kg4,189lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 313 km/h 194 mph | 298 km/h 185 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 310 km/h / 193 mph+11.6 s Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph+12.1 s Calculated | 75.8s99% target: 285 km/h / 177 mph+11.9 s Calculated | 63.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s-1.1 s | 4.2s-0.7 s | 4.4s-0.5 s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.3s-5.0 s | 13.8s-3.5 s | 15.0s-2.3 s | 17.3s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s-1.0 s Calculated | 4.0s-0.7 s Calculated | 4.2s-0.5 s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s-1.3 s Calculated | 12.2s-0.8 s Calculated | 12.5s-0.5 s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 341hp/t254kW/t155hp/1000 lb Calculated | 296hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated | 268hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 227hp/t170kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 518Nm/t347lb-ft/ton Calculated | 452Nm/t302lb-ft/ton Calculated | 408Nm/t273lb-ft/ton Calculated | 334Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 552km343mi Calculated | 552km343mi Calculated | 552km343mi Calculated | 552km343mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,380mm172in | 4,380mm172in | 4,380mm172in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,803mm71in | 1,803mm71in | 1,803mm71in | 1,803mm71in |
| Height | 1,420mm56in | 1,420mm56in | 1,420mm56in | 1,420mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,660mm105in | 2,660mm105in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,541mm61in | 1,541mm61in | 1,541mm61in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,541mm61in | 1,541mm61in | 1,541mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | 120mm5in | 120mm5in | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 370L | 370L | 370L | 370L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 53L | 53L | 53L | 53L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 (Stage 3) 510 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 (Stage 2) 442 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 (Stage 1) 401 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 340 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp | 5,900 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp | 5,900 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp | 5,900 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp | 5,900 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.0 s | 4.2 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.2 s | 4.4 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.3 s | 13.8 s | 15.0 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | 313 km/h 194 mph | 298 km/h 185 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.3 s | 5.4 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.0 s | 8.2 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 10.3 s | 10.5 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 12.2 s | 12.5 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 196 km/h 122 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp | 510 hp 380 kW |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp | 442 hp 330 kW |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp | 401 hp 299 kW |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp | 340 hp 254 kW |
BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 (Stage 3) 510 hp has 170 hp more than BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 340 hp.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 340 hp and BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 (Stage 3) 510 hp: 170 hp (127 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp | 775 Nm 572 lb-ft |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp | 675 Nm 498 lb-ft |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp | 313 km/h 194 mph |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp | 3.8 s |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp | 4.2 s |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp | 4.4 s |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 (Stage 3) 510 hp and BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 340 hp: 1.1 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 (Stage 2) 442 hp and BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 (Stage 1) 401 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp | 341 hp/t 254 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp | 296 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp | 227 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp | 552 km 343 mi |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp | 552 km 343 mi |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp | 552 km 343 mi |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp | 552 km 343 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.8 s | 313 km/h 194 mph |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp | 442 hp 330 kW | 4.2 s | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp | 401 hp 299 kW | 4.4 s | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 (Stage 3) 510 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp | 341 hp/t 254 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp | 296 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp | 227 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 3)510 hp | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 2)442 hp | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0 (Stage 1)401 hp | BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0340 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 442 hp 330 kW | 401 hp 299 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 775 Nm 572 lb-ft | 675 Nm 498 lb-ft | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.2 s | 4.4 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 313 km/h 194 mph | 298 km/h 185 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 552 km 343 mi | 552 km 343 mi | 552 km 343 mi | 552 km 343 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 341 hp/t 254 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 296 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 227 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 (Stage 3) 510 hp | BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 (Stage 2) 442 hp | BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 (Stage 1) 401 hp | BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 340 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 (Stage 3) 510 hp
- Has 68 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 (Stage 2) 442 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























