Jaguar XK Coupe (X150)
Car comparison
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8vsBMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 1 Series Coupe (E82)
135i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Best power-to-weight205 hp/t153 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk370 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque411 Nm303 lb-ft
- Best estimated range629 km391 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 298hp222kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 411Nm303lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 2,035kg4,486lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 87.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.0s Calculated | 19.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 268Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 629km391mi Calculated | 576km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,791mm189in | 4,360mm172in |
| Width | - | 1,748mm69in |
| Height | 1,322mm52in | 1,408mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,752mm108in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,470mm58in |
| Rear track | - | 1,497mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | 132mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 370L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 53L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 5,800 rpm | 1,300-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.0 s | 19.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 306 hp 228 kW |
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i has 8 hp more than Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 and BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 6.2 s |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 629 km 391 mi |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 576 km 358 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 298 hp 222 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 629 km 391 mi | 576 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 | BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8
- Has 11 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 53 km (33 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























