Bentley Continental GTC III
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC III Speed 6.0 TSI W12vsPorsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 Cabriolet (992)
Turbo S 3.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight380 hp/t283 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score77/100
Bentley Continental GTC III Speed 6.0 TSI W12
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph
- Most powerful659 hp491 kW
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Largest trunk235 L
- Best practicality score43/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 659hp491kW | 650hp485kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,436kg5,370lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,865kg6,316lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.6s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 70.3s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.3s Calculated | 9.3s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 10.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 271hp/t202kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated | 380hp/t283kW/t172hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated | 468Nm/t313lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 593km368mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,950cc363cu in | 3,745cc229cu in |
| Length | 4,850mm191in | 4,535mm179in |
| Width | 2,187mm86in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,399mm55in | 1,301mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,849mm112in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | - | 1,583mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,600mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 235L | 128L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 67L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC III Speed 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 6,750 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.3 s | 9.3 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 51.1 s | 53.4 s |
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 6.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 8.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 10.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 126 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 659 hp 491 kW |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 650 hp 485 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC III Speed 6.0 TSI W12 has 9 hp more than Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8 and Bentley Continental GTC III Speed 6.0 TSI W12: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 2,436 kg 5,370 lb |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 3.7 s |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 2.8 s |
Although Bentley Continental GTC III Speed 6.0 TSI W12 has more power, Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8 and Bentley Continental GTC III Speed 6.0 TSI W12: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 380 hp/t 283 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 659 hp 491 kW | 3.7 s | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 650 hp 485 kW | 2.8 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 659 hp 491 kW | 650 hp 485 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,436 kg 5,370 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 593 km 368 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | 128 L 4.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 380 hp/t 283 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC III Speed 6.0 TSI W12
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 107 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8
- Is 726 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 110 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























