Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12vsMercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) · Facelift 2017 AMG S 65
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) · Facelift 2017
AMG S 65
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Lightest2,180 kg4,806 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions272 g/km
- Best estimated range667 km414 mi
- Largest trunk350 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score45/100
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Most powerful710 hp529 kW
- Highest torque1,017 Nm750 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight289 hp/t216 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 | Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 710hp529kW | 630hp470kW |
| Torque | 1,017Nm750lb-ft | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,455kg5,412lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | 2,625kg5,787lb |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 148.3s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 52.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.7s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 24.4L/100 km9.6mpg US11.6mpg UK | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 289hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated | 289hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 414Nm/t277lb-ft/ton Calculated | 459Nm/t307lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 566km352mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,980cc365cu in |
| Length | 4,818mm190in | 5,051mm199in |
| Width | 1,947mm77in | - |
| Height | 1,390mm55in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,945mm116in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,645mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 350L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 362g/km | 272g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 | 5,900 rpm | 2,050-4,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 4,800-5,400 rpm | 2,300-4,300 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 | Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.7 s | 14.3 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 115.5 s | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 | 710 hp 529 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 630 hp 470 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 has 80 hp more than Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65 and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: 80 hp (60 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 | 1,017 Nm 750 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 | 2,455 kg 5,412 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 2,180 kg 4,806 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 | 8.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 4.1 s |
Although Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 has more power, Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65 and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: 3.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65 and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 | 566 km 352 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 | 710 hp 529 kW | 8.0 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 630 hp 470 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 |
| 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12 | Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 710 hp 529 kW | 630 hp 470 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,017 Nm 750 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,455 kg 5,412 lb | 2,180 kg 4,806 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 566 km 352 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 362 g/km | 272 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 289 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 | Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.83 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.78 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,174 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12
- Has 80 hp more
- Has 17 Nm more
- Has 70 km/h (43 mph) higher top speed
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65
- Is 275 kg lighter
- Is 3.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 101 km (63 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
- Emits 90 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























