Bentley Continental GTC
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48VvsBentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015
V8 S 4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Lightest2,470 kg5,445 lb
- Lowest city consumption16.1 L/100 km14.6 mpg US17.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best performance score83/100
- Best economy score77/100
Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V
- Fastest top speed314 km/h195 mph
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Best power-to-weight224 hp/t167 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score71/100
- Best practicality score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 528hp394kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,495kg5,501lb | 2,470kg5,445lb |
| Gross weight | 2,910kg6,415lb | 2,900kg6,393lb |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 99.0s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated | 91.1s99% target: 305 km/h / 189 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 27.4L/100 km8.6mpg US10.3mpg UK | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 811km504mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 3,993cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,807mm189in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | 1,918mm76in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,398mm55in | 1,403mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,745mm108in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,664mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,655mm65in |
| Trunk volume | - | 260L |
| Max trunk volume | 235L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 258g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 6,100 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 15.3 s |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW |
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0 | 528 hp 394 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V has 32 hp more than Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0 and Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V: 32 hp (24 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0 | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0 | 308 km/h 191 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 5.1 s |
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0 | 4.7 s |
Although Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V has more power, Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0 and Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0 | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW | 5.1 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0 | 528 hp 394 kW | 4.7 s | 308 km/h 191 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 528 hp 394 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 308 km/h 191 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | 2,470 kg 5,445 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 811 km 504 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 258 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V
- Has 32 hp more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























