Car comparison

Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12vsMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Continental GT III

Speed 6.0 TSI W12

659 hp5950 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2021-2024
VS

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)

63 S E PERFORMANCE V8

612 hp3982 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12

  • Fastest top speed
    335 km/h
    208 mph
  • Most powerful
    659 hp
    491 kW
  • Highest torque
    900 Nm
    664 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    290 hp/t
    216 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    358 L
  • Best practicality score
    50/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
Power
659hp491kW
612hp456kW
Torque
900Nm664lb-ft
850Nm627lb-ft
Curb weight
2,273kg5,011lb
2,120kg4,674lb
Gross weight
2,725kg6,008lb
2,365kg5,214lb
Top speed
335 km/h
208 mph
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
62.5s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph
Calculated
49.2s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.6s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
10.3s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.4s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.3s
Calculated
10.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
290hp/t216kW/t132hp/1000 lb
Calculated
289hp/t215kW/t131hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
396Nm/t265lb-ft/ton
Calculated
401Nm/t268lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
854km530mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,950cc363cu in
3,982cc243cu in
Length
4,850mm191in
4,728mm186in
Width-
1,984mm78in
Height
1,405mm55in
1,354mm53in
Wheelbase
2,851mm112in
2,700mm106in
Front track-
1,683mm66in
Rear track-
1,686mm66in
Trunk volume
358L
182L
Max trunk volume-
562L
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
90L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W125,000-6,000 rpm1,500-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V85,750-6,500 rpm2,500-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.4 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.6 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.3 s
8.1 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
42.2 s
38.5 s
Top speed
335 km/h
208 mph
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
1.7 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.5 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.6 s
8.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.3 s
10.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
211 km/h
131 mph
225 km/h
140 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12 has 47 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8 and Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12: 47 hp (35 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12
2,273 kg
5,011 lb
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
2,120 kg
4,674 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12
335 km/h
208 mph
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12 has more power, Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8 and Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12: 0.8 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12
290 hp/t
216 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
289 hp/t
215 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12
659 hp
491 kW
3.6 s
335 km/h
208 mph
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
612 hp
456 kW
2.8 s
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12
Power
659 hp
491 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
335 km/h
208 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
Power
612 hp
456 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
182 L
6.4 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyContinental GT IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
Power
659 hp
491 kW
612 hp
456 kW
Torque
900 Nm
664 lb-ft
850 Nm
627 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.6 s
2.8 s
Top speed
335 km/h
208 mph
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Lightness
2,273 kg
5,011 lb
2,120 kg
4,674 lb
Fuel consumption
-
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
182 L
6.4 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in
Range score
-
854 km
530 mi
Trunk score
358 L
12.6 cu ft
182 L
6.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
290 hp/t
216 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
289 hp/t
215 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
Consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12

  • Has 47 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 176 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Bentley Continental GT III Speed 6.0 TSI W12 vs Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 S E PERFORMANCE V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster