Bentley Continental GT III
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT III 4.0 V8vsPorsche 911 (992) Sport Classic 3.7
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 (992)
Sport Classic 3.7
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT III 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed318 km/h198 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque770 Nm568 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range804 km499 mi
- Largest trunk358 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Porsche 911 (992) Sport Classic 3.7
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight350 hp/t261 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 770Nm568lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,725kg6,008lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.8s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 64.5s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s Calculated | 12.0s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 254hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 350hp/t261kW/t159hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 356Nm/t238lb-ft/ton Calculated | 382Nm/t256lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 804km499mi Calculated | 523km325mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 3,745cc229cu in |
| Length | 4,850mm191in | 4,535mm179in |
| Width | 2,187mm86in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,299mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,851mm112in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | - | 1,577mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 115mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 358L | 132L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 67L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT III 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 (992) Sport Classic 3.7: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 | 6,750 rpm | 2,000-6,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 12.0 s |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 11.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 196 km/h 122 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 2,165 kg 4,773 lb |
| Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 4.0 s |
| Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT III 4.0 V8 and Porsche 911 (992) Sport Classic 3.7: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GT III 4.0 V8 and Porsche 911 (992) Sport Classic 3.7: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 804 km 499 mi |
| Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 | 523 km 325 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.0 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.1 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 |
| 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GT III 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8 | Porsche911 (992)Sport Classic 3.7 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,165 kg 4,773 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 804 km 499 mi | 523 km 325 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 358 L 12.6 cu ft | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT III 4.0 V8 | Porsche 911 (992) Sport Classic 3.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km | 22.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year | 3,360 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT III 4.0 V8
- Has 170 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 280 km (174 mi) more estimated range
- Has 226 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Porsche 911 (992) Sport Classic 3.7
- Is 595 kg lighter
- Has 96 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























