Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8vsBentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190)

S 4.0 V8

510 hp3982 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2015-2017
VS

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015

V8 S 4.0

528 hp3993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    320 km/h
    199 mph Unrestricted
    310 km/h
    193 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,645 kg
    3,627 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    310 hp/t
    231 kW/t
    3.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.6 L/100 km
    24.5 mpg US
    29.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.5 L/100 km
    18.8 mpg US
    22.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    224 g/km
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    90/100
  • Best economy score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
Power
510hp380kW
528hp394kW
Torque
650Nm479lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
1,645kg3,627lb
2,295kg5,060lb
Gross weight
1,890kg4,167lb
2,750kg6,063lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Calculated
309 km/h
192 mph
To 99% top speed
58.4s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph
Calculated
82.5s99% target: 306 km/h / 190 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
4.5s
0-200 km/h
10.8s
Calculated
14.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
4.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.5s
Calculated
12.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
310hp/t231kW/t141hp/1000 lb
Calculated
230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton
Calculated
296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
677km421mi
Calculated
841km523mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
3,993cc244cu in
Length
4,546mm179in
4,806mm189in
Width
1,939mm76in
1,944mm77in
Height
1,288mm51in
1,404mm55in
Wheelbase
2,630mm104in
2,746mm108in
Front track
1,680mm66in
1,664mm66in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,655mm65in
Ground clearance
98mm4in
-
Trunk volume-
358L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
65L
90L
CO2 emissions
224g/km
250g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V86,250 rpm1,750-4,750 rpm6,500 rpm
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.06,000 rpm1,700 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
4.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
4.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.8 s
14.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Likely limited
309 km/h
192 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.8 s
10.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.5 s
12.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
207 km/h
128 mph
187 km/h
116 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
528 hp
394 kW

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0 has 18 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0: 18 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
1,645 kg
3,627 lb
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
2,295 kg
5,060 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
309 km/h
192 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V83.8 s
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.04.5 s

Although Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0 has more power, Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
310 hp/t
231 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
677 km
421 mi
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
841 km
523 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
3.8 s
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
528 hp
394 kW
4.5 s
309 km/h
192 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,546 mm
179.0 in
Height
1,288 mm
50.7 in
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
Power
528 hp
394 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
309 km/h
192 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
Power
528 hp
394 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
309 km/h
192 mph
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
3.8 s
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
4.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
310 hp/t
231 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
Power
510 hp
380 kW
528 hp
394 kW
Torque
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
309 km/h
192 mph
Lightness
1,645 kg
3,627 lb
2,295 kg
5,060 lb
Fuel consumption
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,546 mm
179.0 in
Height
1,288 mm
50.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
Range score
677 km
421 mi
841 km
523 mi
CO2 score
224 g/km
250 g/km
Trunk score
-
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
310 hp/t
231 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0
Consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.80 LC100 km18.72 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.04 LC100 mi30.13 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,520 LC/year2,809 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8

  • Is 650 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 80 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 26 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0

  • Has 18 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 164 km (102 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8
Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

S 4.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8
V8 S 4.0
V8 S 4.0
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0vsBentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0
S 4.0 V8
55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
V8 S 4.0
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0vsBentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8
V8 S 4.0
V8 S 4.0
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0vsBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
S 4.0 V8
AMG C 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8
V8 S 4.0
6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0vsBentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
S 4.0 V8
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
V8 S 4.0
V8 S 4.0
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0vsBentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0
S 4.0 V8
AMG GLC 63 S
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 S
V8 S 4.0
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0vsBentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 vs Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 V8 S 4.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster