Car comparison

BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0vsBentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 V8 4.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW M4 (F82)

GTS 3.0

500 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2016-2017
VS

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015

V8 4.0

507 hp3993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    305 km/h
    190 mph
  • Lightest
    1,510 kg
    3,329 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    331 hp/t
    247 kW/t
    3.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    199 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    445 L
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    88/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
Power
500hp373kW
507hp378kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
660Nm487lb-ft
Curb weight
1,510kg3,329lb
2,295kg5,060lb
Gross weight
1,900kg4,189lb
2,750kg6,063lb
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
To 99% top speed
56.0s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
89.2s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
4.8s
0-200 km/h
11.2s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
4.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
15.5L/100 km15.2mpg US18.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.6s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
331hp/t247kW/t150hp/1000 lb
Calculated
221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
397Nm/t266lb-ft/ton
Calculated
288Nm/t192lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
706km439mi
Calculated
849km528mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,979cc182cu in
3,993cc244cu in
Length
4,689mm185in
4,806mm189in
Width
1,870mm74in
1,944mm77in
Height
1,383mm54in
1,404mm55in
Wheelbase
2,812mm111in
2,746mm108in
Front track
1,596mm63in
1,664mm66in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,655mm65in
Ground clearance
108mm4in
-
Trunk volume
445L
358L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
60L
90L
CO2 emissions
199g/km
246g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0PowerTorque
  • BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.06,250 rpm4,000-5,500 rpm6,500 rpm
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.06,000 rpm1,700 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
4.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
4.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.2 s
15.6 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
5.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
8.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.8 s
10.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.6 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
203 km/h
126 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
500 hp
373 kW
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
507 hp
378 kW

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 has 7 hp more than BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
660 Nm
487 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
2,295 kg
5,060 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
305 km/h
190 mph
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
305 km/h
190 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.03.8 s
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.04.8 s

Although Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 has more power, BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
331 hp/t
247 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
706 km
439 mi
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
849 km
528 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
500 hp
373 kW
3.8 s
305 km/h
190 mph
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
507 hp
378 kW
4.8 s
305 km/h
190 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
3.8 s
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
4.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
331 hp/t
247 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
Power
500 hp
373 kW
507 hp
378 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
660 Nm
487 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
4.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
Lightness
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
2,295 kg
5,060 lb
Fuel consumption
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
Range score
706 km
439 mi
849 km
528 mi
CO2 score
199 g/km
246 g/km
Trunk score
445 L
15.7 cu ft
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
331 hp/t
247 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0
Consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.88 LC100 km18.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.94 LC100 mi29.85 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,231 LC/year2,783 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0

  • Is 785 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 110 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 87 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 47 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Has 143 km (89 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0
Bentley Continental GT II V8 4.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GTS 3.0
CSL 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
V8 4.0
V8 4.0
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0vsBentleyContinental GT IIV8 4.0
GTS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
V8 4.0
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0vsBentleyContinental GT III4.0 V8
GTS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
V8 4.0
V8 4.0
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0vsBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0
GTS 3.0
M850i
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMW8 Series (G15)M850i
V8 4.0
6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0vsBentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
GTS 3.0
CS 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
V8 4.0
V8 S 4.0
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0vsBentleyContinental GTC IIV8 S 4.0
GTS 3.0
M850i V8
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMW8 Series Gran Coupe (G16)M850i V8
V8 4.0
6.8 i V8
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0vsBentleyContinental T6.8 i V8
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 vs Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster