Bentley Continental GT II
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0vsBentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 V8 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015
V8 4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed309 km/h192 mph
- Most powerful521 hp389 kW
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Lightest2,295 kg5,060 lb
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions246 g/km
- Best estimated range857 km533 mi
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 521hp389kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,295kg5,060lb | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 309 km/h 192 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.0s99% target: 306 km/h / 190 mph Calculated | 88.4s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 15.5L/100 km15.2mpg US18.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 857km533mi Calculated | 849km528mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,993cc244cu in | 3,993cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,664mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,655mm65in |
| Trunk volume | - | 358L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 246g/km | 246g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.3 s | 15.5 s |
| Top speed | 309 km/h 192 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 521 hp 389 kW |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 507 hp 378 kW |
Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0 has 14 hp more than Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 and Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 309 km/h 192 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 4.5 s |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 857 km 533 mi |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 849 km 528 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 521 hp 389 kW | 4.5 s | 309 km/h 192 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.8 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT IIV8 S 4.0 | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 521 hp 389 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 309 km/h 192 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 857 km 533 mi | 849 km 528 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 246 g/km | 246 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 358 L 12.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0 | Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT II V8 S 4.0
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 8 km (5 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 V8 4.0
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























