Bentley Continental GT II
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT II Speed 6.0 W12vsRolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Wraith
6.6 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT II Speed 6.0 W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed331 km/h206 mph
- Lightest2,320 kg5,115 lb
- Best power-to-weight270 hp/t201 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range621 km386 mi
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score68/100
Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12
- Most powerful632 hp471 kW
- Highest torque870 Nm642 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption22.2 L/100 km10.6 mpg US12.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions327 g/km
- Best practicality score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 | Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 626hp467kW | 632hp471kW |
| Torque | 820Nm605lb-ft | 870Nm642lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,440kg5,379lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,810kg6,195lb |
| Top speed | 331 km/h 206 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.5s99% target: 328 km/h / 204 mph Calculated | 66.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.4L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK | 22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 270hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 259hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 353Nm/t236lb-ft/ton Calculated | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 621km386mi Calculated | 568km353mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 6,592cc402cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 5,285mm208in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,947mm77in |
| Height | 1,394mm55in | 1,507mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 3,112mm123in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,622mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,668mm66in |
| Trunk volume | - | 470L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | 338g/km | 327g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT II Speed 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
- Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 5,600 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 | Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 16.3 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 59.7 s | - |
| Top speed | 331 km/h 206 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 196 km/h 122 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 626 hp 467 kW |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 632 hp 471 kW |
Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12 has 6 hp more than Bentley Continental GT II Speed 6.0 W12.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Speed 6.0 W12 and Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 820 Nm 605 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 870 Nm 642 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 2,440 kg 5,379 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 331 km/h 206 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 4.2 s |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 4.5 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12 has more power, Bentley Continental GT II Speed 6.0 W12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Speed 6.0 W12 and Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 621 km 386 mi |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 568 km 353 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 626 hp 467 kW | 4.2 s | 331 km/h 206 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 632 hp 471 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 |
| 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 |
| 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GT II Speed 6.0 W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12 | Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 626 hp 467 kW | 632 hp 471 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 820 Nm 605 lb-ft | 870 Nm 642 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 331 km/h 206 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb | 2,440 kg 5,379 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 621 km 386 mi | 568 km 353 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 338 g/km | 327 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT II Speed 6.0 W12 | Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK | 14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.38 LC100 km | 25.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi | 41.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal | 2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,806 LC/year | 3,833 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT II Speed 6.0 W12
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 66 km/h (41 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 52 km (32 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest CO2 emissions
Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Emits 11 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























